Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:37

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Re-ranking the 16 super regional teams in the 2025 NCAA baseball tournament - NCAA.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The latest on the Knicks' coaching search and their interest in Jason Kidd - Marc Stein | Substack
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the central theme of the entire Bible in one word (if possible)?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
5 Observations on Jaguars Minicamp Day 2 - Sports Illustrated
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How night lizards survived the asteroid that ended the dinosaurs - Phys.org
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Are you afraid of being alone?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
CBS Sports and Pac-12 extend partnership through the 2030-31 season - Pac-12 Conference